Supreme Court of Nepal – Adventure Sports https://blogs.dw.com/adventuresports Mountaineering, climbing, expeditions, adventures Wed, 20 Feb 2019 13:29:24 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 Nepal’s Supreme Court strucks down new Everest rules https://blogs.dw.com/adventuresports/nepals-supreme-court-strucks-down-new-everest-rules/ Thu, 08 Mar 2018 16:56:10 +0000 http://blogs.dw.com/adventuresports/?p=33047

South side of Mount Everest

The government of Nepal has to revise the controversial new mountaineering rules for Mount Everest and other mountains in the country higher than 6,500-meters. The country’s Supreme Court supported the position of several plaintiffs who found that the new rules were a discrimination against disabled people. Among other things, the government had decided at the end of December with immediate effect not to issue permits to double-amputee climbers and blind people. The complainants had stated inter alia that Nepal had signed the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and that the new rules clearly contradicted these rights. This opinion was followed by the five judges of the Supreme Court.

“Summited a bureaucratic Everest”

Hari Budha Magar wants to scale Everest

Hari Budha Magar was one of the mountaineers who, according to the new regulations, should not have received a permit this spring. The 38-year-old Nepalese, who had lost both legs above the knee as a soldier of the British Gurkha Regiment in a bomb blast in Afghanistan in 2010, actually wanted to climb Everest in 2018 from the south side. After the decision of the government, which he sharply criticized, he had initially suspended his plan. “Now, we have summited a bureaucratic Mt. Everest,” Hari wrote on Facebook after the decision of the Supreme Judge in Kathmandu. “Thank you Supreme Court, you are our hope to get justice. This is true example of Nepalese judiciary system, keep it up! I hope Department of Tourism will implement this Supreme Court order. Let’s climb real Mt Everest together!”

Part one of the new rules is tipped, part two continues for the time being. The government had also prohibited future solo climbs of the highest mountains. Nobody has so far filed a suit against this rule.

]]>
Highest court of Nepal scraps Everest record https://blogs.dw.com/adventuresports/highest-court-of-nepal-scraps-everest-record/ Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:38:51 +0000 http://blogs.dw.com/adventuresports/?p=32297

Mount Everest

The Supreme Court of Nepal, the highest court in the Himalayan state, does not recognize the supposedly fastest ascent of Mount Everest. There was no evidence that Pemba Dorje Sherpa really ascended on 21 May 2004 in just eight hours and 10 minutes from the base camp on the south side of the highest mountain in the world to the summit at 8,850 meters, the court said, adding that there was no summit picture, nor could another climber confirm that Pemba Dorje had been at the top that day. The court said that the record was now back to Lakpa Gelu Sherpa, who had reached the summit on 26 May 2003 in ten hours and 56 minutes.

Long dispute

Pemba Dorje Sherpa with record certificate

The two Sherpas have been arguing about the record for 14 years. First, Pemba Dorje had set a new best time on 23 May 2003, climbing up in 12 hours and 45 minutes, which Lakpa Gelu had undercut by barely two hours only three days later. Pemba doubted Lakpa’s time and demanded an official investigation. The Ministry of Tourism looked into the case and acknowledged Lakpa Gelu’s time. A year later, Pemba Dorje presented his new best time, which was also listed in the Guinness Book of Records.

“Not impossible, but unlikely”

Now it was Lakpa who accused Pemba of lying – and who enjoyed a late legal success with his appeal before the Supreme Court today. Elisabeth Hawley, the now 94-year-old legendary chronicler of mountaineering in the Himalayas, also expressed her skepticism about the record time of eight hours and ten minutes in 2004. “Pemba Dorje doesn’t have any substantiation. He says he got to the summit at 2 am and not a soul was there,” the American then said. “The weather conditions were dreadful, which doesn’t make it impossible but unlikely.”

 

]]>